Serviettenknödel vs Kartoffelknödel
Overall, Kartoffelknödel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Serviettenknödel | Kartoffelknödel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 193 kcal | 106 kcal |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Hefe, Trockenvollei | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kartoffelknödel has 45% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 193 kcal).
- Kartoffelknödel has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8.1 g).
- Kartoffelknödel has 89% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Kartoffelknödel has 76% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Kartoffelknödel has 66% less salt (1.1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Serviettenknödel has 71% more protein (5.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kartoffelknödel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Serviettenknödel lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Hefe, Trockenvollei.
Ingredients
Serviettenknödel
Semmelwürfel (57 %) (_Weizenmehl_, Speisesalz, _Hefe_, Rapsöl, Palmfett), _Weizenmehl_, Palmfett, _Trockenvollei_, _Magermilchpulver_, Speisesalz, Zwiebeln, Petersilie, Gewürz.
Kartoffelknödel
Kartoffeln* 72 %, Kartoffelstärke*, Meersalz, Sonnenblumenöl*, Zwiebelpulver*, Muskatnuss*, Kurkuma*, Liebstockwurzel* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Gluten und Milch enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Serviettenknödel or Kartoffelknödel?
Overall, Kartoffelknödel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kartoffelknödel has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 193 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kartoffelknödel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.