Schoko Reis Waffeln vs Galettes de riz complet
Overall, Galettes de riz complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schoko Reis Waffeln | Galettes de riz complet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 439 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 21 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 8.6 g | 4.2 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galettes de riz complet has 94% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 439 kcal).
- Galettes de riz complet has 96% less fat (0.5 g vs 14 g).
- Galettes de riz complet has 72% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 3.2 g).
- Galettes de riz complet has 97% less sugar (0.7 g vs 21 g).
- Schoko Reis Waffeln has 51% more fiber (8.6 g vs 4.2 g).
- Schoko Reis Waffeln has 95% more protein (10 g vs 0.5 g).
- Galettes de riz complet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Galettes de riz complet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Schoko Reis Waffeln lists: Milk.
- Only Galettes de riz complet lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Schoko Reis Waffeln
Vollmilchschokolade* 60% (Rohrzucker*, Kakaobutter*, Vollmilchpulver*, Kakaomasse*), Vollkornreis* 40%
Galettes de riz complet
Riz complet 99%, graines de sésame 1% * Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schoko Reis Waffeln or Galettes de riz complet?
Overall, Galettes de riz complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galettes de riz complet has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 439 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Galettes de riz complet has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 21 g per 100 g.