Comparison
Schmand vs Fru Fru
Overall, Fru Fru has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand | Fru Fru |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fru Fru has 66% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 243 kcal).
- Fru Fru has 89% less fat (2.6 g vs 24 g).
- Fru Fru has 90% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 16.8 g).
- Schmand has 69% less sugar (3.4 g vs 11 g).
- Fru Fru has 18% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Fru Fru has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Schmand
Schmand-Sauermilcherzeugnis aus ultrahocherhitzter Sahne, 24% Fett Ungeoffnet
Fru Fru
nom fru Fru gerührt Sauermilch BA Pekting in
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand or Fru Fru?
Overall, Fru Fru has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fru Fru has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 11 g per 100 g.