Comparison
Schmand vs 9% biezpiens
Overall, 9% biezpiens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand | 9% biezpiens |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.8 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 9% biezpiens has 27% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 243 kcal).
- 9% biezpiens has 63% less fat (9 g vs 24 g).
- 9% biezpiens has 64% less saturated fat (6 g vs 16.8 g).
- Schmand has 15% less sugar (3.4 g vs 4 g).
- 9% biezpiens has 86% more protein (20 g vs 2.8 g).
- 9% biezpiens has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only 9% biezpiens lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Schmand
Schmand-Sauermilcherzeugnis aus ultrahocherhitzter Sahne, 24% Fett Ungeoffnet
9% biezpiens
_piens_, pienskābo baktēriju ieraugs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand or 9% biezpiens?
Overall, 9% biezpiens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
9% biezpiens has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 4 g per 100 g.