Comparison
Kulturmelk vs Fru Fru
Overall, Kulturmelk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kulturmelk | Fru Fru |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kulturmelk has 34% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 82 kcal).
- Kulturmelk has 60% less sugar (4.4 g vs 11 g).
- Kulturmelk has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kulturmelk lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kulturmelk
melk (2,6 % fett), melkesyrekultur
Fru Fru
nom fru Fru gerührt Sauermilch BA Pekting in
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kulturmelk or Fru Fru?
Overall, Kulturmelk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kulturmelk has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kulturmelk has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 11 g per 100 g.