Comparison

Sauce Mafé vs Satay stir fry sauce

Overall, Sauce Mafé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSauce MaféSatay stir fry sauce
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 116 kcal 101 kcal
Fat 8.2 g 4.2 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.9 g
Sugars 0 g 8 g
Salt 0.9 g 1 g
Fiber 1.8 g 1.4 g
Protein 3.7 g 3.2 g
Additives02
AllergensPeanutsGluten, Peanuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Satay stir fry sauce has 13% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 116 kcal).
  • Satay stir fry sauce has 49% less fat (4.2 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Satay stir fry sauce has 31% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Sauce Mafé has no sugar, while Satay stir fry sauce has 8 g.
  • Sauce Mafé has 22% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Sauce Mafé has 14% more protein (3.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Sauce Mafé is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Satay stir fry sauce lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Sauce Mafé

Eau, patate douce, cacahuète grillée 12%(Égypte), tomate (France, Italie), oignons, huile de tournesol, sel, ail, épices

Satay stir fry sauce

Water, Peanut (9%), Sugar, Soy Sauce (4%) [Water, Soya Bean, Wheat, Salt], Shallot (3%), Modified Maize Starch, Garlic, Ground Spices (1%) [Coriander, Turmeric, Cumin, Ginger, Fenugreek, Fennel, Black Pepper], Galangal, Tamarind Extract, Chilli, Salt, Acidity Regulator (Lactic Acid), Lemongrass, Makrut Lime Leaf, Colour (Paprika Extract).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sauce Mafé or Satay stir fry sauce?

Overall, Sauce Mafé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Satay stir fry sauce has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sauce Mafé has less sugar: 0 g versus 8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons