Sauce Mafé vs Erdnuss Satay Sauce
Overall, Sauce Mafé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sauce Mafé | Erdnuss Satay Sauce |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 116 kcal | 378 kcal |
| Fat | 8.2 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Peanuts | Peanuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sauce Mafé has 69% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 378 kcal).
- Sauce Mafé has 74% less fat (8.2 g vs 31 g).
- Sauce Mafé has 89% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 12 g).
- Sauce Mafé has no sugar, while Erdnuss Satay Sauce has 17 g.
- Sauce Mafé has 35% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Sauce Mafé has 50% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0.9 g).
- Erdnuss Satay Sauce has 30% more protein (5.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Sauce Mafé has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sauce Mafé is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Erdnuss Satay Sauce lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Sauce Mafé
Eau, patate douce, cacahuète grillée 12%(Égypte), tomate (France, Italie), oignons, huile de tournesol, sel, ail, épices
Erdnuss Satay Sauce
Kokosnussmilch 54%, pflanzliches Öl (Sojaöl), Currypaste (Schalotten, Knoblauch, Galgant, Chili, Zitronengras, Kuminpulver, Koriandersamen), Zucker, Erdnüsse 5%, Speisesalz, Geschmacksverstärker: E621, Currypulver, Farbstoff: E160c
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sauce Mafé or Erdnuss Satay Sauce?
Overall, Sauce Mafé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sauce Mafé has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauce Mafé has less sugar: 0 g versus 17 g per 100 g.