Comparison

Sardines au naturel vs Dos de cabillaud MSC

Overall, Dos de cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Sardines au naturel	Dos de cabillaud MSC
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	3	1
Calories	149 kcal	79 kcal
Fat	6.3 g	0.5 g
Saturated fat	2.2 g	0 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	0.7 g	0.2 g
Fiber	0 g	0.1 g
Protein	23 g	17.9 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Fish	Fish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Dos de cabillaud MSC has 47% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 149 kcal).
Dos de cabillaud MSC has 92% less fat (0.5 g vs 6.3 g).
Dos de cabillaud MSC has no saturated fat, while Sardines au naturel has 2.2 g.
Dos de cabillaud MSC has 72% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
Sardines au naturel has 22% more protein (23 g vs 17.9 g).
Dos de cabillaud MSC is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Sardines au naturel

Sardines 70%, eau, sel.

Dos de cabillaud MSC

Cabillaud

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sardines au naturel or Dos de cabillaud MSC?

Overall, Dos de cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dos de cabillaud MSC has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 149 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sardines au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Rollmöpse vs Dos de cabillaud MSC Sardines au naturel vs Rollmöpse Dos de cabillaud MSC vs Œufs de truite d’Aquitai... Sardines au naturel vs Œufs de truite d’Aquitai... Dos de cabillaud MSC vs Filets de limande du Nor... Dos de cabillaud MSC vs Potón rodajas a la galle... Smoked Haddock Melt in t... vs Dos de cabillaud MSC Sardines au naturel vs Filets de limande du Nor...