Dos de cabillaud MSC vs Potón rodajas a la gallega
Overall, Dos de cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dos de cabillaud MSC | Potón rodajas a la gallega |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 79 kcal | 119 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 5.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 10.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de cabillaud MSC has 34% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 119 kcal).
- Dos de cabillaud MSC has 91% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.8 g).
- Dos de cabillaud MSC has no saturated fat, while Potón rodajas a la gallega has 1 g.
- Dos de cabillaud MSC has no sugar, while Potón rodajas a la gallega has 0.6 g.
- Dos de cabillaud MSC has 82% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Dos de cabillaud MSC has 40% more protein (17.9 g vs 10.8 g).
- Dos de cabillaud MSC has the better Nutri-Score.
- Dos de cabillaud MSC is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Dos de cabillaud MSC lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Dos de cabillaud MSC
Cabillaud
Potón rodajas a la gallega
OPotón 40% (sal, reguladores de la acidez (E-330, E-331 y E-501) y estabilizante (E-450)), patata 35% (antioxidante (E-300)), aceite de oliva 2,5%, sal y pimentón de la Vera DOP dulce y picante 0,1%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dos de cabillaud MSC or Potón rodajas a la gallega?
Overall, Dos de cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dos de cabillaud MSC has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de cabillaud MSC has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.