Comparison

Dos de cabillaud MSC vs Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine

Overall, Dos de cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDos de cabillaud MSCŒufs de truite d’Aquitaine
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 79 kcal 180 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 6.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.4 g
Salt 0.2 g 2.3 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0 g
Protein 17.9 g 26 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dos de cabillaud MSC has 56% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 180 kcal).
  • Dos de cabillaud MSC has 92% less fat (0.5 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Dos de cabillaud MSC has no saturated fat, while Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has 1.3 g.
  • Dos de cabillaud MSC has no sugar, while Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has 0.4 g.
  • Dos de cabillaud MSC has 92% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has 31% more protein (26 g vs 17.9 g).
  • Dos de cabillaud MSC has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Dos de cabillaud MSC

Cabillaud

Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine

Oeufs de truite (oncorhynchus mykiss)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dos de cabillaud MSC or Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine?

Overall, Dos de cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dos de cabillaud MSC has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 180 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dos de cabillaud MSC has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons