Rollmöpse vs Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine
Overall, Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rollmöpse | Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 121 kcal | 180 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 6.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rollmöpse has 33% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 180 kcal).
- Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has 20% less fat (6.1 g vs 7.6 g).
- Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has 32% less salt (2.3 g vs 3.4 g).
- Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has 54% more protein (26 g vs 12 g).
- Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rollmöpse
50% Rollmops (SOF hareng (poisson), 18%i cornichons, sel, vinaigre d talco.cre, arôme naturel d'épices), 46 % marinade (eau, vinaigre dl eool, édulcorant : saccharines; sel, arôme naturel d'aneth, acÌdF}ant : acétates de sodium), oignons, graines de moutardej Morceaux de carotte, feuilles de laurier. Traces éventuelles de lait et d'oeuf. Pourcentages rapportés aux Rollmops. Non ouvert,
Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine
Oeufs de truite (oncorhynchus mykiss)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rollmöpse or Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine?
Overall, Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rollmöpse has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 180 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Œufs de truite d’Aquitaine has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.