Comparison

Salmón al natural vs Lomo de salmón

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalmón al naturalLomo de salmón
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 136 kcal 223 kcal
Fat 7.7 g 16 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 2.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 16 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salmón al natural has 39% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 223 kcal).
  • Salmón al natural has 52% less fat (7.7 g vs 16 g).
  • Salmón al natural has 48% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Lomo de salmón has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Lomo de salmón has 20% more protein (20 g vs 16 g).
  • Lomo de salmón is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Salmón al natural

_Salmón_ (Salmo salar) (_pescado_), agua, sal. Puede contener trazas de _moluscos_ y _crustáceos_.

Lomo de salmón

Salmón sin piel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salmón al natural or Lomo de salmón?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salmón al natural has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salmón al natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons