Salade mexicaine végétalienne vs SPAR tonhal saláta
Overall, Salade mexicaine végétalienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salade mexicaine végétalienn... | SPAR tonhal saláta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salade mexicaine végétalienne has 31% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Salade mexicaine végétalienne has 16% less sugar (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- SPAR tonhal saláta has 12% more protein (9.6 g vs 8.4 g).
- Only SPAR tonhal saláta lists: Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Salade mexicaine végétalienne
Protéines de pois (25%) haricots rouges (21%), maïs (1,4%), huile de carthame, pols chiches, eau, paprika rouge (4%), sel, oignon et ail séchés, paprika en poudre, tomate en poudre, coriandre, extraits naturels d'épices.
SPAR tonhal saláta
Kukorica 31%, tonhal (Katsuwonus pelamis) 26%, sárgarépa 13%, zöldborsó 10%, kukoricacsíraolaj, ivóvíz, sózott fekete olajbogyó 3,1%, (fekete olajbogyó, étkezési só), citromlé, tengeri só. Glutént, tojást, tejet és mustárt tartalmazhat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salade mexicaine végétalienne or SPAR tonhal saláta?
Overall, Salade mexicaine végétalienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
SPAR tonhal saláta has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salade mexicaine végétalienne has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.