Comparison

Salade catalane au poulet vs Salade à la Catalane au thon

Overall, Salade à la Catalane au thon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade catalane au pouletSalade à la Catalane au thon
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 126 kcal 131 kcal
Fat 7.5 g 5.8 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 4.3 g 2.3 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber — 1.5 g
Protein 4.8 g 9.9 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade à la Catalane au thon has 23% less fat (5.8 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Salade à la Catalane au thon has 55% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Salade à la Catalane au thon has 47% less sugar (2.3 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Salade à la Catalane au thon has 52% more protein (9.9 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Salade à la Catalane au thon has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Salade à la Catalane au thon lists: Fish, Gluten.

Ingredients

Salade catalane au poulet

Not available.

Salade à la Catalane au thon

25% thon (poissons), 24% pâtes cuites (eau, semoule de blé dur), tomates, oignons, huile de colza, 5% poivrons rouges, 4,3% poivrons verts, 3,2% olives noires, concentré de tomates, vinaigre de Xérès, sucre, sel, ail, plantes aromatiques, jus de citron concentré, amidon modifié (maïs), épaississants: gomme xanthane, gomme guar; arôme naturel, poivre noir. Traces éventuelles d'œufs.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade catalane au poulet or Salade à la Catalane au thon?

Overall, Salade à la Catalane au thon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade catalane au poulet has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 131 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade à la Catalane au thon has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons