Comparison

Rotmiks vs Noix tigrée pelée biologique (souchet)

Overall, Rotmiks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRotmiksNoix tigrée pelée biologique...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 48 kcal 456 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 26.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 5.1 g
Sugars 6.6 g 15.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 10.8 g
Protein 1.6 g 4.1 g
Additives00
AllergensCeleryNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rotmiks has 89% fewer calories (48 kcal vs 456 kcal).
  • Rotmiks has 99% less fat (0.3 g vs 26.8 g).
  • Rotmiks has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Rotmiks has 57% less sugar (6.6 g vs 15.5 g).
  • Noix tigrée pelée biologique (souchet) has 61% more protein (4.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Rotmiks has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rotmiks lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Rotmiks

Beter (50%), sellerirot (25%), pastinakk (25 %).

Noix tigrée pelée biologique (souchet)

100% Noix Tigrées Pelées Biologiques.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rotmiks or Noix tigrée pelée biologique (souchet)?

Overall, Rotmiks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rotmiks has fewer calories: 48 kcal versus 456 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rotmiks has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons