Rotmiks vs Noix tigrée pelée biologique (souchet)
Overall, Rotmiks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rotmiks | Noix tigrée pelée biologique... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 48 kcal | 456 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 26.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 15.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 10.8 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 4.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rotmiks has 89% fewer calories (48 kcal vs 456 kcal).
- Rotmiks has 99% less fat (0.3 g vs 26.8 g).
- Rotmiks has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.1 g).
- Rotmiks has 57% less sugar (6.6 g vs 15.5 g).
- Noix tigrée pelée biologique (souchet) has 61% more protein (4.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rotmiks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rotmiks lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Rotmiks
Beter (50%), sellerirot (25%), pastinakk (25 %).
Noix tigrée pelée biologique (souchet)
100% Noix Tigrées Pelées Biologiques.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rotmiks or Noix tigrée pelée biologique (souchet)?
Overall, Rotmiks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rotmiks has fewer calories: 48 kcal versus 456 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rotmiks has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.