Comparison

Roasted Turkey Breast vs Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRoasted Turkey BreastPechuga de pavo reducido en...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 89 kcal 77 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 1.3 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.4 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 19.6 g 16.5 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has 14% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 89 kcal).
  • Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Roasted Turkey Breast has no saturated fat, while Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has 0.3 g.
  • Roasted Turkey Breast has no sugar, while Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has 1.3 g.
  • Roasted Turkey Breast has 16% more protein (19.6 g vs 16.5 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Roasted Turkey Breast is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Roasted Turkey Breast

organic turkey breast, water, sea salt, organic vinegar

Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas

Pechuga de pavo (65%), agua, jarabe de glucosa, dextrosa, cloruro potásico, cloruro sódico, estabilizantes (E-451i, E-407), aromas, antioxidante (E-301), conservadores (E-261, E-250).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Roasted Turkey Breast or Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roasted Turkey Breast has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons