Comparison

Pavofrio pechuga de pavo horno de leña vs Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas

Overall, Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPavofrio pechuga de pavo hor...Pechuga de pavo reducido en...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 82 kcal 77 kcal
Fat 1 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.3 g
Sugars 2.2 g 1.3 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.4 g
Protein 16 g 16.5 g
Additives76
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has 41% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has 24% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pavofrio pechuga de pavo horno de leña

Pechuga de pavo (66%), agua, aromas estabilizantes (E420. E450, E407 E508, E412). dextrosa, sal, azúcar, antioxidante (E316) COnservador E250), especias.

Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas

Pechuga de pavo (65%), agua, jarabe de glucosa, dextrosa, cloruro potásico, cloruro sódico, estabilizantes (E-451i, E-407), aromas, antioxidante (E-301), conservadores (E-261, E-250).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pavofrio pechuga de pavo horno de leña or Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas?

Overall, Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pechuga de pavo reducido en sal finas lonchas has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons