Roasted Pine Nut Hummus vs Mung Dal
Overall, Roasted Pine Nut Hummus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roasted Pine Nut Hummus | Mung Dal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 267 kcal | 504 kcal |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 17.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | — |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 22.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roasted Pine Nut Hummus has 47% fewer calories (267 kcal vs 504 kcal).
- Mung Dal has 18% less fat (17.5 g vs 21.4 g).
- Roasted Pine Nut Hummus has 78% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 8 g).
- Mung Dal has 72% less sugar (1 g vs 3.6 g).
- Mung Dal has 69% more protein (22.7 g vs 7.1 g).
- Roasted Pine Nut Hummus has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Roasted Pine Nut Hummus lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Roasted Pine Nut Hummus
ORGANIC CHICKPEAS, WATER, ORGANIC SESAME TAHINI, ORGANIC SUNFLOWER OIL, ORGANIC LEMON JUICE, ORGANIC GARLIC, SEA SALT, ORGANIC CUMIN. TOPPING: ORGANIC SUNFLOWER OIL, ORGANIC PINE NUTS, WATER, ORGANIC RED PEPPER, ORGANIC MINCED GARLIC, ORGANIC CUMIN, ORGANIC PARSLEY, SEA SALT, CITRIC ACID, ORGANIC ONION. CONTAINS: Pine Nuts, Sesame.
Mung Dal
INGREDIENTS: MUNG BEAN SPLITS (85%), EDIBLE VEGETABLE OIL (PALMOLEIN, RICE BRAN), EDIBLE COMMON SALT, BLACK SALT.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roasted Pine Nut Hummus or Mung Dal?
Overall, Roasted Pine Nut Hummus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roasted Pine Nut Hummus has fewer calories: 267 kcal versus 504 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mung Dal has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.