Riz Sauvage vs Wholegrain rice with quinoa
Overall, Riz Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Sauvage | Wholegrain rice with quinoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 5.9 g | 7.5 g |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wholegrain rice with quinoa has 54% fewer calories (164 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- Riz Sauvage has 59% less fat (1.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Riz Sauvage has 82% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Wholegrain rice with quinoa has 88% less sugar (0.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Wholegrain rice with quinoa has 21% more fiber (7.5 g vs 5.9 g).
- Riz Sauvage has 73% more protein (14.7 g vs 4 g).
- Riz Sauvage has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Riz Sauvage
riz sauvage
Wholegrain rice with quinoa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Sauvage or Wholegrain rice with quinoa?
Overall, Riz Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wholegrain rice with quinoa has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wholegrain rice with quinoa has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.