Comparison

Riz Sauvage vs Wholegrain rice with quinoa

Overall, Riz Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz SauvageWholegrain rice with quinoa
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 356 kcal 164 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 1.1 g
Sugars 2.5 g 0.3 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 5.9 g 7.5 g
Protein 14.7 g 4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wholegrain rice with quinoa has 54% fewer calories (164 kcal vs 356 kcal).
  • Riz Sauvage has 59% less fat (1.1 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Riz Sauvage has 82% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Wholegrain rice with quinoa has 88% less sugar (0.3 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Wholegrain rice with quinoa has 21% more fiber (7.5 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Riz Sauvage has 73% more protein (14.7 g vs 4 g).
  • Riz Sauvage has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Riz Sauvage

riz sauvage

Wholegrain rice with quinoa

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz Sauvage or Wholegrain rice with quinoa?

Overall, Riz Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wholegrain rice with quinoa has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wholegrain rice with quinoa has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons