Riz Sauvage vs Long grain & wild rice
Overall, Riz Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Sauvage | Long grain & wild rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.9 g | — |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Long grain & wild rice has 45% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Long grain & wild rice has no sugar, while Riz Sauvage has 2.5 g.
- Riz Sauvage has 52% more protein (14.7 g vs 7 g).
- Riz Sauvage has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Riz Sauvage
riz sauvage
Long grain & wild rice
Parboiled langgraan rijst (85%), wilde rijst (15%) Ingrédients: riz long grain étuvé (85%). riz sauvage (15%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Sauvage or Long grain & wild rice?
Overall, Riz Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Long grain & wild rice has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Long grain & wild rice has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.