Long grain & wild rice vs Riso long e wild
Overall, Long grain & wild rice has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Long grain & wild rice | Riso long e wild |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Long grain & wild rice has 57% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Long grain & wild rice has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Long grain & wild rice has no sugar, while Riso long e wild has 0.6 g.
- Riso long e wild has 26% more protein (9.4 g vs 7 g).
Ingredients
Long grain & wild rice
Parboiled langgraan rijst (85%), wilde rijst (15%) Ingrédients: riz long grain étuvé (85%). riz sauvage (15%)
Riso long e wild
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Long grain & wild rice or Riso long e wild?
Overall, Long grain & wild rice has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riso long e wild has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Long grain & wild rice has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.