Comparison

Riz Sauvage vs Riso long e wild

Overall, Riz Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz SauvageRiso long e wild
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 356 kcal 351 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.5 g
Sugars 2.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 5.9 g 3.4 g
Protein 14.7 g 9.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riz Sauvage has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Riso long e wild has 76% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Riz Sauvage has 42% more fiber (5.9 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Riz Sauvage has 36% more protein (14.7 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Riz Sauvage has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Riz Sauvage

riz sauvage

Riso long e wild

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz Sauvage or Riso long e wild?

Overall, Riz Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riso long e wild has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riso long e wild has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons