Ring-Salami vs Salam de Sibiu
Overall, Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ring-Salami | Salam de Sibiu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 445 kcal | 475 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 41.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 16.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 4.8 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 23.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ring-Salami has 11% less fat (37 g vs 41.5 g).
- Salam de Sibiu has 47% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Salam de Sibiu has 21% less salt (3.8 g vs 4.8 g).
- Ring-Salami has 10% more protein (26 g vs 23.4 g).
- Salam de Sibiu is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Ring-Salami lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Ring-Salami
Schweinefleisch, Salz, _Laktose_, Dextrose, Zucker, Gewürze, Konservierungsstoffe: Kaliumnitrat, Kaliumnitrit; Starterkulturen.
Salam de Sibiu
carne de porc, slănină, sare, zaharuri, condimente, acid ascorbic, nitrit de sodiu
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ring-Salami or Salam de Sibiu?
Overall, Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ring-Salami has fewer calories: 445 kcal versus 475 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salam de Sibiu has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.