Comparison

Ring-Salami vs Original Peperami

Overall, Ring-Salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRing-SalamiOriginal Peperami
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 445 kcal 501 kcal
Fat 37 g 44 g
Saturated fat 15 g 17 g
Sugars 1.5 g 2 g
Salt 4.8 g 3.9 g
Protein 26 g 23 g
Additives24
AllergensMilkPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ring-Salami has 11% fewer calories (445 kcal vs 501 kcal).
  • Ring-Salami has 16% less fat (37 g vs 44 g).
  • Ring-Salami has 12% less saturated fat (15 g vs 17 g).
  • Ring-Salami has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Original Peperami has 19% less salt (3.9 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Ring-Salami has 12% more protein (26 g vs 23 g).
  • Only Ring-Salami lists: Milk.
  • Only Original Peperami lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Ring-Salami

Schweinefleisch, Salz, _Laktose_, Dextrose, Zucker, Gewürze, Konservierungsstoffe: Kaliumnitrat, Kaliumnitrit; Starterkulturen.

Original Peperami

pork, iodised salt (salt, potassium iodate), dextrose, spices, pork fat, flavour enhancer (monosodium glutamate, disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate), preservative (sodium nitrite), beechwood smoke

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ring-Salami or Original Peperami?

Overall, Ring-Salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ring-Salami has fewer calories: 445 kcal versus 501 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ring-Salami has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons