Ring-Salami vs 10 Lunchbox Minis
Overall, Ring-Salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ring-Salami | 10 Lunchbox Minis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 445 kcal | 496 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 4.8 g | 4.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ring-Salami has 10% fewer calories (445 kcal vs 496 kcal).
- Ring-Salami has 16% less fat (37 g vs 44 g).
- Ring-Salami has 17% less saturated fat (15 g vs 18 g).
- Ring-Salami has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- 10 Lunchbox Minis has 15% less salt (4.1 g vs 4.8 g).
- Ring-Salami has 12% more protein (26 g vs 23 g).
- Only Ring-Salami lists: Milk.
- Only 10 Lunchbox Minis lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Ring-Salami
Schweinefleisch, Salz, _Laktose_, Dextrose, Zucker, Gewürze, Konservierungsstoffe: Kaliumnitrat, Kaliumnitrit; Starterkulturen.
10 Lunchbox Minis
pork, iodised salt (salt, potassium iodate), inulin, spices, dextrose, flavour enhancers (monosodium glutamate, disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate), beetroot juice powder, preservative (sodium nitrite), beech wood smoke,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ring-Salami or 10 Lunchbox Minis?
Overall, Ring-Salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ring-Salami has fewer calories: 445 kcal versus 496 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ring-Salami has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.