10 Lunchbox Minis vs Salam de Sibiu
Overall, Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 10 Lunchbox Minis | Salam de Sibiu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 496 kcal | 475 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 41.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 16.6 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 4.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 23.4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salam de Sibiu has 60% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Salam de Sibiu is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only 10 Lunchbox Minis lists: Pork.
Ingredients
10 Lunchbox Minis
pork, iodised salt (salt, potassium iodate), inulin, spices, dextrose, flavour enhancers (monosodium glutamate, disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate), beetroot juice powder, preservative (sodium nitrite), beech wood smoke,
Salam de Sibiu
carne de porc, slănină, sare, zaharuri, condimente, acid ascorbic, nitrit de sodiu
FAQ
Which is healthier: 10 Lunchbox Minis or Salam de Sibiu?
Overall, Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salam de Sibiu has fewer calories: 475 kcal versus 496 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salam de Sibiu has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.