Comparison

Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g vs Salam de Sibiu

Overall, Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalami Danois - x20 tranches...Salam de Sibiu
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 390 kcal 475 kcal
Fat 33 g 41.5 g
Saturated fat 13 g 16.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.8 g
Salt 4 g 3.8 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 22 g 23.4 g
Additives31
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g has 18% fewer calories (390 kcal vs 475 kcal).
  • Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g has 20% less fat (33 g vs 41.5 g).
  • Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g has 22% less saturated fat (13 g vs 16.6 g).
  • Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Salam de Sibiu is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g

Viande et gras de porc (UE), sel, dextrose, colorant : rouge de betterave, épices et plante aromatique, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments de maturation. Fumé au bois de hêtre. Traces éventuelles de moutarde. 135 g de viande de porc mis en oeuvre pour 100 g de produit fini.

Salam de Sibiu

carne de porc, slănină, sare, zaharuri, condimente, acid ascorbic, nitrit de sodiu

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g or Salam de Sibiu?

Overall, Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 475 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salami Danois - x20 tranches, 200g has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons