Rich Tea Finger Biscuits vs Patanjali
Overall, Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rich Tea Finger Biscuits | Patanjali |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 460 kcal | 468 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 8.3 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 24 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has 18% less fat (14 g vs 17 g).
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has 28% less saturated fat (6 g vs 8.3 g).
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has 25% less sugar (18 g vs 24 g).
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has 25% more fiber (8 g vs 6 g).
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rich Tea Finger Biscuits lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Rich Tea Finger Biscuits
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Sugar, Palm Oil, Barley Malt Extract, Partially Inverted Sugar Syrup, Salt, Raising Agents (Sodium Bicarbonate, Ammonium Bicarbonate)
Patanjali
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rich Tea Finger Biscuits or Patanjali?
Overall, Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has fewer calories: 460 kcal versus 468 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has less sugar: 18 g versus 24 g per 100 g.