Eit Whela digestive vs Patanjali
Overall, Patanjali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Eit Whela digestive | Patanjali |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 499 kcal | 468 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 8.3 g |
| Sugars | 7.7 g | 24 g |
| Salt | — | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 4.1 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Patanjali has 26% less fat (17 g vs 23 g).
- Patanjali has 41% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 14 g).
- Eit Whela digestive has 68% less sugar (7.7 g vs 24 g).
- Patanjali has 32% more fiber (6 g vs 4.1 g).
- Patanjali has 64% more protein (7.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Only Eit Whela digestive lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Eit Whela digestive
wheat flour, sugar, vegetable oils, cocoa mass, cocoa butter, milk powder, whey powder, emulsifier, salt, leavening agents, flavoring
Patanjali
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Eit Whela digestive or Patanjali?
Overall, Patanjali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Patanjali has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eit Whela digestive has less sugar: 7.7 g versus 24 g per 100 g.