M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies vs Patanjali
Overall, Patanjali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies | Patanjali |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 426 kcal | 468 kcal |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.4 g | 8.3 g |
| Sugars | 36.8 g | 24 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Patanjali has 21% less fat (17 g vs 21.4 g).
- Patanjali has 27% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 11.4 g).
- Patanjali has 35% less sugar (24 g vs 36.8 g).
- M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies has 60% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Patanjali has 88% more fiber (6 g vs 0.7 g).
- Patanjali has 19% more protein (7.2 g vs 5.9 g).
- Only M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies
Sugar · Wheatflour* · Dried Whole Milk · Palm Oil · Cocoa Butter · Soft Brown Sugar · Cocoa Mass · Dried Skimmed Milk · Butter (Milk) · Rapeseed Oil · Black Treacle · Water · Raising Agent: Sodium Bicarbonate · Natural Flavouring · Lecithin · Natural Vanilla Flavouring · Salt.
Patanjali
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies or Patanjali?
Overall, Patanjali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
M&S Milk Chocolate Cookies has fewer calories: 426 kcal versus 468 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patanjali has less sugar: 24 g versus 36.8 g per 100 g.