Comparison

Choc Chunk Cookies Milk Chocolate vs Patanjali

Overall, Patanjali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChoc Chunk Cookies Milk Choc...Patanjali
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 491 kcal 468 kcal
Fat 23.9 g 17 g
Saturated fat 12.6 g 8.3 g
Sugars 30.9 g 24 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.7 g 6 g
Protein 5.7 g 7.2 g
Additives80
AllergensGluten, Milk, Soybeans, OatmealNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Patanjali has 29% less fat (17 g vs 23.9 g).
  • Patanjali has 34% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Patanjali has 22% less sugar (24 g vs 30.9 g).
  • Choc Chunk Cookies Milk Chocolate has 45% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Patanjali has 71% more fiber (6 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Patanjali has 22% more protein (7.2 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Only Choc Chunk Cookies Milk Chocolate lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans, Oatmeal.

Ingredients

Choc Chunk Cookies Milk Chocolate

Wheat Flour (_Wheat_ Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), _Milk_ Chocolate Chunks 27% (Sugar, Cocoa Mass, Dried Whole _Milk_, Cocoa Butter, Dried Whey (_Milk_), Vegetable Fats (Palm, Shea, Sal, Mango Kernel), Emulsifier: _Soya_ Lecithin), Palm Oil, Sugar, _Oatmeal_, Invert Sugar Syrup, Desiccated Coconut, Glucose Syrup, Molasses, Raising Agents: Ammonium Bicarbonate, Sodium Bicarbonate, Disodium Diphosphates; Salt, Emulsifier: _Soya_ Lecithin; Flavouring

Patanjali

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Choc Chunk Cookies Milk Chocolate or Patanjali?

Overall, Patanjali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Patanjali has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 491 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Patanjali has less sugar: 24 g versus 30.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons