Patanjali vs Tim Tam
Overall, Patanjali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Patanjali | Tim Tam |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 468 kcal | 525 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 26.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.3 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 24 g | 45.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 4.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 10 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Patanjali has 11% fewer calories (468 kcal vs 525 kcal).
- Patanjali has 37% less fat (17 g vs 26.9 g).
- Patanjali has 45% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 15 g).
- Patanjali has 47% less sugar (24 g vs 45.5 g).
- Tim Tam has 62% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Patanjali has 73% more fiber (6 g vs 1.6 g).
- Patanjali has 42% more protein (7.2 g vs 4.2 g).
- Only Tim Tam lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Patanjali
Not available.
Tim Tam
Sugar, Fortified Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Palm Oil (Contains Soy), Whole Milk Powder, Cocoa Butter, Cocoa Mass, Partially Inverted Refiners Syrup, Colours (Ammonia Caramel, Beetroot Red, Cochineal), Vegetable Fats (Shea and/or Sal), Starch (Wheat), Milk Fat, Raising Agents (Ammonium Bicarbonate, Sodium Bicarbonate), Cocoa Powder (0.3%), Emulsifiers (Soy Lecithins, E476), Salt, Flavouring, Flour Treatment Agent (E223 (Sulphites)).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Patanjali or Tim Tam?
Overall, Patanjali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Patanjali has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 525 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patanjali has less sugar: 24 g versus 45.5 g per 100 g.