8909081005053 vs Tim Tam
Overall, 8909081005053 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 8909081005053 | Tim Tam |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 507 kcal | 525 kcal |
| Fat | 27.3 g | 26.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.7 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 35.7 g | 45.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 4.2 g |
| Additives | 8 | 10 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 8909081005053 has 15% less saturated fat (12.7 g vs 15 g).
- 8909081005053 has 22% less sugar (35.7 g vs 45.5 g).
- 8909081005053 has 42% more protein (7.3 g vs 4.2 g).
- Only Tim Tam lists: Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
8909081005053
CHOCO CRÈME (38.0%) {SUGAR, REFINED PALMOLEIN, REFINED PALM OIL, COCOA SOLIDS, EMULSIFIER [LECITHIN (FROM SOYABEAN)], NATURE IDENTICAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES (CHOCOLATE), ARTIFICIAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES (VANILLA)}, MAIDA (REFINED WHEAT FLOUR), HYDROGENATED VEGETABLE OIL, SUGAR, INVERT SYRUP, LIQUID GLUCOSE, RAISING AGENTS [503(ii), 500(ii), 450(i)], COCOA SOLIDS (0.7%), BUTTER, MILK SOLIDS, IODIZED SALT, NATURE IDENTICAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES (*MILK CHOCOLATE), COLOURS (150c, 150d), EMULSIFIERS PKD.: [LECITHIN (FROM SOYABEAN), MONO AND DIGLYCERIDES OF FATTY ACIDS (FROM PALM OIL)], ARTIFICIAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES (MILK, VANILLA)
Tim Tam
Sugar, Fortified Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Palm Oil (Contains Soy), Whole Milk Powder, Cocoa Butter, Cocoa Mass, Partially Inverted Refiners Syrup, Colours (Ammonia Caramel, Beetroot Red, Cochineal), Vegetable Fats (Shea and/or Sal), Starch (Wheat), Milk Fat, Raising Agents (Ammonium Bicarbonate, Sodium Bicarbonate), Cocoa Powder (0.3%), Emulsifiers (Soy Lecithins, E476), Salt, Flavouring, Flour Treatment Agent (E223 (Sulphites)).
FAQ
Which is healthier: 8909081005053 or Tim Tam?
Overall, 8909081005053 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
8909081005053 has fewer calories: 507 kcal versus 525 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
8909081005053 has less sugar: 35.7 g versus 45.5 g per 100 g.