Red Pepper Houmous vs Bio Hummus
Overall, Red Pepper Houmous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red Pepper Houmous | Bio Hummus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 235 kcal | 253 kcal |
| Fat | 18.7 g | 18.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.8 g | 7.2 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sesame seeds | Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Pepper Houmous has 36% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Bio Hummus has 31% more protein (7.8 g vs 5.4 g).
- Red Pepper Houmous has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Hummus is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Red Pepper Houmous
Cooked Chickpeas (Water, Chickpeas) Roasted Red Peppers (20%) Rapeseed Oil Tahini (Sesame Seed Paste) Water Red Chilli Purée Concentrated Lemon Juice Extra Virgin Olive Oil Sugar Salt Garlic Colour: Paprika Extract
Bio Hummus
47% gekochte Kichererbsen (Kichererbsen, Wasser), Wasser, 12% Sesampaste, Rapsöl, 8% eingelegte rote Paprika (Paprika, Speisesalz, Säureregulator: Citronensäure), Branntweinessig, Zucker, 2% gekochte Kichererbsen (Kichererbsen, Wasser, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure), Speisesalz, Gewürze, Petersilie. Kann Spuren von Eiern, Fisch, glutenhaltigem Getreide, Krebstieren, Milch, Schalenfrüchten, Senf und Soja enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red Pepper Houmous or Bio Hummus?
Overall, Red Pepper Houmous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Pepper Houmous has fewer calories: 235 kcal versus 253 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Hummus has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.