RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* vs Ras El Hanout
Overall, RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge... | Ras El Hanout |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 273 kcal | 249 kcal |
| Fat | 4.9 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 25 g |
| Fiber | 27.3 g | — |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ras El Hanout has 72% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.5 g).
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 24% less sugar (3.6 g vs 4.7 g).
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 100% less salt (0.1 g vs 25 g).
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 31% more protein (7.5 g vs 5.2 g).
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*
Curcuma, cannelle, clou de girofle, fenouil, muscade, poivre noir, gingembre, laurier, piment
Ras El Hanout
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* or Ras El Hanout?
Overall, RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ras El Hanout has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.