Comparison

Ras el hanout vs Ras El Hanout

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Better choice
Ras el hanout

Ras el hanout

· 200 g
e
Ras El Hanout

Ras El Hanout

e

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRas el hanoutRas El Hanout
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — —
Calories 270 kcal 249 kcal
Fat 8.7 g 4.9 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.7 g
Sugars 1.6 g 4.7 g
Salt 19 g 25 g
Fiber 22 g —
Protein 11 g 5.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ras El Hanout has 44% less fat (4.9 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Ras El Hanout has 36% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 66% less sugar (1.6 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 24% less salt (19 g vs 25 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 53% more protein (11 g vs 5.2 g).

Ingredients

Ras el hanout

Not available.

Ras El Hanout

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or Ras El Hanout?

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ras El Hanout has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ras el hanout has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Ras el hanout vs Ras el hanout Ras el hanout vs Ras El Hanout Ras El Hanout vs Ras el hanout Ras el hanout vs Ras el hanout Ras el hanout vs RAS EL HANOUT "éco recha... Ras el hanout vs Carrefour The Market Sav... RAS EL HANOUT "éco recha... vs Ras El Hanout Ras El Hanout vs Carrefour The Market Sav...