Ras el hanout vs Ras el hanout
Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ras el hanout | Ras el hanout |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 8 kcal | 270 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 8.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 19 g |
| Fiber | — | 22 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ras el hanout has 97% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 270 kcal).
- Ras el hanout has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8.7 g).
- Ras el hanout has 91% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Ras el hanout has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Ras el hanout has 99% less salt (0.2 g vs 19 g).
- Ras el hanout has 95% more protein (11 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ras el hanout has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ras el hanout
Not available.
Ras el hanout
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or Ras el hanout?
Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ras el hanout has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ras el hanout has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.