Comparison

Ras el hanout vs Ras el hanout

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRas el hanoutRas el hanout
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group — —
Calories 8 kcal 270 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 8.7 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.6 g
Salt 0.2 g 19 g
Fiber — 22 g
Protein 0.5 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ras el hanout has 97% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 270 kcal).
  • Ras el hanout has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 91% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 99% less salt (0.2 g vs 19 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 95% more protein (11 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Ras el hanout has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Ras el hanout

Not available.

Ras el hanout

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or Ras el hanout?

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ras el hanout has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ras el hanout has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons