Comparison

Ras el hanout vs RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRas el hanoutRAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 8 kcal 273 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 4.9 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 2.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 3.6 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 27.3 g
Protein 0.5 g 7.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ras el hanout has 97% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 273 kcal).
  • Ras el hanout has 90% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.6 g).
  • RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 93% more protein (7.5 g vs 0.5 g).

Ingredients

Ras el hanout

Not available.

RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*

Curcuma, cannelle, clou de girofle, fenouil, muscade, poivre noir, gingembre, laurier, piment

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*?

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ras el hanout has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ras el hanout has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons