Ras el hanout vs RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*
Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ras el hanout | RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 8 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 27.3 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ras el hanout has 97% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 273 kcal).
- Ras el hanout has 90% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.9 g).
- Ras el hanout has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Ras el hanout has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 93% more protein (7.5 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Ras el hanout
Not available.
RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*
Curcuma, cannelle, clou de girofle, fenouil, muscade, poivre noir, gingembre, laurier, piment
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*?
Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ras el hanout has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ras el hanout has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.