Ras el hanout vs Ras El Hanout
Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ras el hanout | Ras El Hanout |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 8 kcal | 249 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 25 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ras el hanout has 97% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Ras el hanout has 90% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.9 g).
- Ras el hanout has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Ras el hanout has 89% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.7 g).
- Ras el hanout has 99% less salt (0.2 g vs 25 g).
- Ras El Hanout has 90% more protein (5.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ras el hanout has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ras el hanout
Not available.
Ras El Hanout
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or Ras El Hanout?
Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ras el hanout has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ras el hanout has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.