Comparison

Ras el hanout vs Ras El Hanout

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRas el hanoutRas El Hanout
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group — —
Calories 8 kcal 249 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 4.9 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 4.7 g
Salt 0.2 g 25 g
Protein 0.5 g 5.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ras el hanout has 97% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 249 kcal).
  • Ras el hanout has 90% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 89% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 99% less salt (0.2 g vs 25 g).
  • Ras El Hanout has 90% more protein (5.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Ras el hanout has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Ras el hanout

Not available.

Ras El Hanout

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or Ras El Hanout?

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ras el hanout has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ras el hanout has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons