Comparison

Ras el hanout vs Ras el hanout

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRas el hanoutRas el hanout
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 8 kcal 289 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 14.4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 5.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1 g
Salt 0.2 g 20.9 g
Fiber — 30.4 g
Protein 0.5 g 11.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ras el hanout has 97% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 289 kcal).
  • Ras el hanout has 97% less fat (0.5 g vs 14.4 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 99% less salt (0.2 g vs 20.9 g).
  • Ras el hanout has 96% more protein (11.6 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Ras el hanout has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Ras el hanout

Not available.

Ras el hanout

Especias (cilantro, jengibre, comino, canela, pimentón dulce, hinojo, cayena, pimienta negra, cúrcuma), sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or Ras el hanout?

Overall, Ras el hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ras el hanout has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 289 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ras el hanout has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons