Ras el hanout vs RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*
Overall, RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ras el hanout | RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 8.7 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 19 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 22 g | 27.3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 43% less fat (4.9 g vs 8.7 g).
- Ras el hanout has 57% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Ras el hanout has 55% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3.6 g).
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 19 g).
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 19% more fiber (27.3 g vs 22 g).
- Ras el hanout has 32% more protein (11 g vs 7.5 g).
- RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ras el hanout
Not available.
RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*
Curcuma, cannelle, clou de girofle, fenouil, muscade, poivre noir, gingembre, laurier, piment
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ras el hanout or RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*?
Overall, RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ras el hanout has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ras el hanout has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.