Comparison
Quinoaflocken vs Flocons de quinoa
Overall, Quinoaflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quinoaflocken | Flocons de quinoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 392 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 6.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quinoaflocken has 11% fewer calories (348 kcal vs 392 kcal).
- Quinoaflocken has 28% less fat (5 g vs 6.9 g).
- Quinoaflocken has 58% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Flocons de quinoa has 17% less sugar (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Quinoaflocken has 47% more fiber (6.6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Flocons de quinoa has 14% more protein (16.2 g vs 14 g).
Ingredients
Quinoaflocken
Quinoa
Flocons de quinoa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quinoaflocken or Flocons de quinoa?
Overall, Quinoaflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quinoaflocken has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flocons de quinoa has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Organic Quinoa Flakes vs Quinoaflocken
Quinoaflocken vs Flocons de quinoa
Quinoa Flocken vs Quinoaflocken
Flocons de quinoa vs Flocons de quinoa
Organic Quinoa Flakes vs Flocons de quinoa
Flocons de quinoa vs Flocons de quinoa
Quinoa Flocken vs Flocons de quinoa
Flocons de quinoa vs Flocons de quinoa