Comparison
Quinoa Flocken vs Quinoaflocken
Overall, Quinoa Flocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quinoa Flocken | Quinoaflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quinoa Flocken has no sugar, while Quinoaflocken has 1.8 g.
Ingredients
Quinoa Flocken
Bio Quinoaflocken 100%
Quinoaflocken
Quinoa
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quinoa Flocken or Quinoaflocken?
Overall, Quinoa Flocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quinoaflocken has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quinoa Flocken has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.