Comparison
Quinoa Flocken vs Flocons de quinoa
Overall, Quinoa Flocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quinoa Flocken | Flocons de quinoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 393 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 6.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quinoa Flocken has 10% fewer calories (352 kcal vs 393 kcal).
- Quinoa Flocken has 28% less fat (5 g vs 6.9 g).
- Quinoa Flocken has 58% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Quinoa Flocken has no sugar, while Flocons de quinoa has 1.5 g.
Ingredients
Quinoa Flocken
Bio Quinoaflocken 100%
Flocons de quinoa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quinoa Flocken or Flocons de quinoa?
Overall, Quinoa Flocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quinoa Flocken has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quinoa Flocken has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.