Comparison

Organic Quinoa Flakes vs Quinoaflocken

Overall, Quinoaflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Organic Quinoa Flakes	Quinoaflocken
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	375 kcal	348 kcal
Fat	6.3 g	5 g
Saturated fat	0.8 g	0.5 g
Sugars	2.5 g	1.8 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	5 g	6.6 g
Protein	12.5 g	14 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Quinoaflocken has 20% less fat (5 g vs 6.3 g).
Quinoaflocken has 28% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.5 g).
Quinoaflocken has 24% more fiber (6.6 g vs 5 g).
Quinoaflocken has 11% more protein (14 g vs 12.5 g).

Ingredients

Organic Quinoa Flakes

Organic quinoa. MAY CONTAIN: PEANUTS, TREE NUTS, COCONUT, SOY

Quinoaflocken

Quinoa

FAQ

Which is healthier: Organic Quinoa Flakes or Quinoaflocken?

Overall, Quinoaflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Quinoaflocken has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 375 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Quinoaflocken has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Organic Quinoa Flakes vs Flocons de quinoa Organic Quinoa Flakes vs Quinoa Flocken Quinoaflocken vs Flocons de quinoa Quinoa Flocken vs Quinoaflocken Organic Quinoa Flakes vs Flocons de quinoa Quinoaflocken vs Flocons de quinoa Organic Quinoa Flakes vs Flocons de quinoa Quinoaflocken vs Flocons de quinoa