Comparison
Quinoaflocken vs Flocons de quinoa
Overall, Quinoaflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quinoaflocken | Flocons de quinoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 373 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quinoaflocken has 29% less fat (5 g vs 7 g).
- Quinoaflocken has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Quinoaflocken has 24% more fiber (6.6 g vs 5 g).
- Quinoaflocken has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Quinoaflocken has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Quinoaflocken
Quinoa
Flocons de quinoa
Quinoa
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quinoaflocken or Flocons de quinoa?
Overall, Quinoaflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quinoaflocken has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quinoaflocken has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.