Quinoa Tomates Olives vs Quinoa croquant, amandes et noisettes
Overall, Quinoa Tomates Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Quinoa Tomates Olives
Quinoa croquant, amandes et noisettes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quinoa Tomates Olives | Quinoa croquant, amandes et... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 146 kcal | 217 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quinoa Tomates Olives has 33% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 217 kcal).
- Quinoa Tomates Olives has 65% less fat (3.5 g vs 10 g).
- Quinoa Tomates Olives has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Quinoa Tomates Olives has 44% less sugar (2.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Quinoa croquant, amandes et noisettes has 33% more fiber (4.5 g vs 3 g).
- Quinoa croquant, amandes et noisettes has 31% more protein (7.2 g vs 5 g).
- Only Quinoa croquant, amandes et noisettes lists: Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Quinoa Tomates Olives
Quinoa blond précuit 72,6%, quinoa rouge précuit 13,5%, concentré de tomates 4,3%, oignons, olives noires 2%, tomates séchées 2%, huile d'olive, sel marin, herbes de Provence, ail en poudre, chlorure de potassium, poivre noir.
Quinoa croquant, amandes et noisettes
Quinoa cuit 23% (eau, quinoa), lentilles cuites 19% (eau, lentilles), légumes 16% (tomates 10%, mais), haricots azuki cuits 7,5% (eau, haricots azuki), fèves de soja 7,5%, fruits secs (amandes 3,6%, noisettes grillées 3,6%), huile de colza, raisins secs 3,1%, farine de maïs, vinaigre d'alcool, basilic, épices, jus de citron à base de concentré, farine de riz, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quinoa Tomates Olives or Quinoa croquant, amandes et noisettes?
Overall, Quinoa Tomates Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quinoa Tomates Olives has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 217 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quinoa Tomates Olives has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.