Prosciutto vs Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"
Overall, Prosciutto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Prosciutto
Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prosciutto | Coppa with "Amarone Val... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 214 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 4.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prosciutto has 29% fewer calories (214 kcal vs 300 kcal).
- Prosciutto has 38% less fat (12.5 g vs 20 g).
- Prosciutto has 33% less saturated fat (5.4 g vs 8 g).
- Prosciutto has no sugar, while Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 0.5 g.
- Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 14% more protein (29 g vs 25 g).
Ingredients
Prosciutto
Not available.
Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prosciutto or Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"?
Overall, Prosciutto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prosciutto has fewer calories: 214 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prosciutto has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.