Comparison

Sunca de porc italian vs Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"

Overall, Sunca de porc italian has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSunca de porc italianCoppa with "Amarone Val...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 222 kcal 300 kcal
Fat 12 g 20 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 8 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 5 g 4.3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.5 g
Protein 27.5 g 29 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sunca de porc italian has 26% fewer calories (222 kcal vs 300 kcal).
  • Sunca de porc italian has 40% less fat (12 g vs 20 g).
  • Sunca de porc italian has 93% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 8 g).
  • Sunca de porc italian has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 14% less salt (4.3 g vs 5 g).

Ingredients

Sunca de porc italian

95% Pork, Salt, Vegetable Oils (Rapeseed, Sunflower).

Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sunca de porc italian or Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"?

Overall, Sunca de porc italian has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sunca de porc italian has fewer calories: 222 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sunca de porc italian has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons