Sunca de porc italian vs Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"
Overall, Sunca de porc italian has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Sunca de porc italian
Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sunca de porc italian | Coppa with "Amarone Val... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 222 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 5 g | 4.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 27.5 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sunca de porc italian has 26% fewer calories (222 kcal vs 300 kcal).
- Sunca de porc italian has 40% less fat (12 g vs 20 g).
- Sunca de porc italian has 93% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 8 g).
- Sunca de porc italian has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 14% less salt (4.3 g vs 5 g).
Ingredients
Sunca de porc italian
95% Pork, Salt, Vegetable Oils (Rapeseed, Sunflower).
Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sunca de porc italian or Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"?
Overall, Sunca de porc italian has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sunca de porc italian has fewer calories: 222 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sunca de porc italian has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.