Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" vs Prosciuto
Overall, Prosciuto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"
Prosciuto
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coppa with "Amarone Val... | Prosciuto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 14.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 5.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 32.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prosciuto has 17% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 300 kcal).
- Prosciuto has 29% less fat (14.3 g vs 20 g).
- Prosciuto has 33% less saturated fat (5.4 g vs 8 g).
- Prosciuto has no sugar, while Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 0.5 g.
- Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 17% less salt (4.3 g vs 5.2 g).
- Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Prosciuto lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"
Not available.
Prosciuto
pork, salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" or Prosciuto?
Overall, Prosciuto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prosciuto has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prosciuto has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.