Comparison

Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" vs Prosciuto

Overall, Prosciuto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCoppa with "Amarone Val...Prosciuto
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 300 kcal 250 kcal
Fat 20 g 14.3 g
Saturated fat 8 g 5.4 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 4.3 g 5.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 29 g 32.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Prosciuto has 17% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 300 kcal).
  • Prosciuto has 29% less fat (14.3 g vs 20 g).
  • Prosciuto has 33% less saturated fat (5.4 g vs 8 g).
  • Prosciuto has no sugar, while Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 0.5 g.
  • Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 17% less salt (4.3 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Prosciuto lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella"

Not available.

Prosciuto

pork, salt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Coppa with "Amarone Valpolicella" or Prosciuto?

Overall, Prosciuto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Prosciuto has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Prosciuto has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons